What climate-change sceptics have long suspected turns out to be 100% true: Having devoted entire careers to whipping up scenarios of catastrophe and ruin, it seems your settled scientists are anything but. By their own admission, they are case studies in depression and abnormal psychology […]
Twenty years ago, to most people, global warming was believed true.
Fifteen years ago, doubts about global warming became a name change to ‘climate change’.
Ten years ago, it was obvious that any warming had stopped.
Five years ago, following the climategate emails, it was known as a scam, and CO2 was innocent.
Today, the scaremongers are being fitted for straight-jackets. The Climate Derangement Syndrome.
Guest essay by Eric Worrall Does a scientist crying about apocalyptic predictions make their science more convincing? According to The Guardian; Should scientists show emotion while discussing their science? I ask because a professor of ocean geology wept as she discussed with me the impact carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are having on the sea. She…
It takes a ‘nut’ to know a ‘nut’.
Having had their first paper “Recursive Fury” retracted by the journal that originally published it, these clowns are back with a reboot that has the same sad message: “people who question the veracity of global warming/climate change are nutters”. What’s funny is that Lew et al don’t seem to realize they are talking about a… (themselves? Edit.)