the hidden agenda …

Australia needs to divest from the UN, now. In every way. “Climate Change’ turns out to have become a Marxist agenda to control your wallet, and your mind.

UNFCCC Chief: Our aim is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

Geoff Brown reports

U.N. Climate Chief: We’re ‘Intentionally’ Transforming The World Economy

Truth Revolt

The United Nation’s top climate change official Christiana Figueres announced this week that the group is actively working to “intentionally transform” the world’s economic development model, a task she called the “most difficult” one the group has ever undertaken.

“This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model, for the first time in human history,” UNFCCC Executive Secretary Figueres stated at a press conference in Brussels Tuesday.

image

Also reported by IBD:

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare

Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said.

The cat’s out of the bag. There is no approaching ecological calamity. The aim is to destroy capitalism.

As Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace wrote:

The collapse of World Communism and the fall of the Berlin Wall led to the environmental movement being hijacked by the political and social activists who learned to use green language to cloak agendas that had more to do with anticapitalism and antiglobalization than with science or ecology.

In the meantime, the world is burning up, not from climate change, but the weapons of war. So what happened? Obama.

About Tom Harley

Amateur ecologist and horticulturalist and CEO of Kimberley Environmental Horticulture Inc. (Tom Harley)
This entry was posted in Climate, comedy, Environment, media, weather and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to the hidden agenda …

  1. cartoonmick says:

    Unable to give valid argument against climate change facts, the deniers now turn their focus to the messengers in an endeavour to demonise them as enemy’s of capitalism.
    Lets stay on focus please boys and girls, there really is a climate change problem which man has made major contributions to.
    We need to get our politicians to ignore the naysayers and pay attention to the scientists. Believe it or not, scientists actually know more about science than businessmen, and couldn’t give a damn about capitalism.
    This cartoon looks at one aspect of it .. . . .

    https://cartoonmick.wordpress.com/editorial-political/#jp-carousel-775

    Cheers
    Mick

  2. Ros Toby says:

    Dear Tom,

    I’ve been a reader of your post for quite a long time now, it is always interesting & I like it very much. I thought you might like to see this item I was sent today, it is quite damning & terrible. I haven’t had time to verify everything in the article for myself, nevertheless it acknowledges things which are somewhat known about by those who are interested in these things, although very little of actual substance is easy to find. Kind regards – Ros

    Published On: Wed, Feb 18th, 2015 Northern America | By Susanne Posel

    Did the CIA Really Contact Climatologist About Weaponized Weather?

    Share ThisCIAClimateUSA

    Susanne Posel (OC) : Lauren Casey, professor at Rutgers University is claiming that her friend Alan Robock, former climatologist, said that he was contacted by an unnamed person asserting they were a “consultant” to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) contacted him regarding weaponized weather. Robock’s alleged statement came during an argument between him and Casey over “the use of geoengineering to combat climate change”. The former climatologist made the CIA contact claim during a discussion at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Robok said that the caller was a contractor for the CIA and asked him “if we control someone else’s climate, would they then know about it?” Before the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) was decommissioned, this experiment was capable of producing torrential rain storms and horrendous drought, earthquakes, tsunamis and most other “natural” disasters seen periodically as a normal geological and bio-spherical pattern. In 1998, Bernard Eastlund, contractor for the European Space Agency (ESA), wrote a paper on how to knock out tornadoes using HAARP instruments on the ground. That paper was peer-reviewed and presented in Italy and it was widely accepted. Nine years later, Aledia Centeno Rodriquez, speaker at the UN General Assembly on Decolonization (UNGAD) mentioned the use of an “ionospheric heater” used by the Arecibo National Astronomy and Ionospheric Center (NAIC) in conjunction with HAARP, which has a patent filed in the US mentioning the experiment’s ability to conduct ionospheric manipulation. According to the patent, HAARP can also function as an anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense system, permit interception and disruption of communications, [disruption of] weather and submarine and subterranean communications, among other things. HAARP is capable of being able to “simulate and perform the same function as performed by the detonation of a heavy type nuclear device”. The US government has been looking into the possibility of connections between changing weather and war over resources. In 2012, the National Research Council (NRC) announced they are conducting a study that will analyze and “evaluate the evidence on possible connections between climate change and U.S. national security concerns and to identify ways to increase the ability of the intelligence community to take climate change into account in assessing political and social stresses with implications for U.S. national security.” The NRC, initiated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) released a report entitled “Climate and Social Stress: Implications for Security Analysis” explains that extreme weather frequency is expected to increase and that this environmental shift is viewed as a disruption to be planned for. The summation is that knowledge of climate change and its possible extremes could assist the intelligence community in mitigating damage to operational missions. And since it is the consensus of eco-fascists that man is the cause of climate change, the matter is best settled if there were educational directions concerning national security with regard to global warming. According to the report: “Tropical storms and the increased storm surges that result from sea-level rise and, in some cases, land subsidence can disrupt production, refining and transport of petroleum. In addition, because offshore oil and gas platforms are generally not designed to accommodate a permanent rise in mean sea level, climate-related sea-level rise would disrupt production.” The totality of analysis for national security encompasses climate science, political issues and social science which is viewed as “an important need is to integrate the social science of natural disasters and disaster response with other forms of analysis. This body of knowledge is particularly important for assessing the security consequences of climate change because disruptive climate events will typically be perceived and responded to as natural disasters.” The report explains: “The intelligence community presumably already uses an analogous process to consider the ability of foreign governments and societies to withstand various kinds of social and political stresses. The results of stress tests would inform national security decision makers about places that are at risk of becoming security concerns as a result of climate events and could be used by the U.S. government or international aid agencies to target high-risk places for efforts to reduce susceptibilities or to improve coping, response and recovery capacities.” Another report entitled “National Security and the Threat of Climate Change” is an assessment of climate change’s impact on national security and the mounting threats identified by CNA. This report asserts that climate change is a definitive threat to national security because it “acts as a threat multiplier for instability in some of the most volatile regions of the world.” By adding tensions to citizens of even developed countries, the possibility of being cut off from energy sources, necessities and protection is a concern of the US military. The suggested solution is a commitment “to a stronger national and international role to help stabilize climate changes at levels that will avoid significant disruption to global security and stability.” Susanne Posel, Occupy Corporatism

    • Tom Harley says:

      Hi Ros, I did see the headline, and put it down in my mind as rubbish. The thought that the climate can be changed by what we do is wishful thinking, we haven’t really even been able to make it rain properly, or change the weather, let alone climate.
      I think it’s an ideological wish from the people that are intent on having control over us.
      I have seen plenty of weather changes, but not climate, which takes hundreds of years for any effective change that isn’t just a local effect. Here is an example:
      Not A Lot of People Know That https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/02/17/one-hundred-years-in-the-norwegian-sea/

      • Tom Harley says:

        I also found this on Linked in just now:
        To fix the climate, geoengineering or geopolitics?

        Bob Payne Principal Consultant at Human Dimensions Associates
        To fix the climate, geoengineering or geopolitics? | The Chronicle-Journal chroniclejournal.com

        SUSTAINABILITY MATTERS By Jason MacLean I never imagined I’d say this, but when it comes to fixing the climate, we have to be more like the Toronto Maple Leafs. Let me explain. For years the Leafs have tried for the quick fix, the breakaway pass…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s