tombstone smashed … flowers sent

Institution gets shock, takes down ‘artwork’, deletes article, waits for authorities to investigate. Christopher Monckton at his best, destroys propaganda institution’s reputation. Well played sir!:

I’m dead. Send flowers

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley Recently my lovely wife and I visited a hotbed of British totalitarianism, Anglia Ruskin “University” at Cambridge, to gather evidence for the courts in connection with a death threat that the “University” and one of its students had made against me in the form of a widely-publicized tombstone with my…

Continue reading →

This is how a ‘takedown’ happens. Well worth going there and reading. His Lordship has a superb grasp of the mathematics of climate change, and to the ‘University’s’ shock, the English legal system! His paper below, with co-authors Willie Soon, David Legates, Matt Briggs, debunks all previous climate models showing AGW.

Here is the No 1 downloaded paper ever by the Science Bulletin, abstract below:

Why models run hot: results from an irreducibly simple climate model

Christopher Monckton¹, Willie W.-H. Soon², David R. Legates³, William M. Briggs⁴

1. Science and Public Policy Institute, Haymarket, VA 20169, USA;
2. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA;
3. Department of Geography, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA;
4. New York, NY 10021, USA

Download: PDF (1511 KB) HTML ( 0 )
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

AbstractAn irreducibly simple climate-sensitivity model is designed to empower even non-specialists to research the question how much global warming we may cause. In 1990, the First Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) expressed “substantial confidence” that near-term global warming would occur twice as fast as subsequent observation. Given rising CO₂ concentration, few models predicted no warming since 2001. Between the pre-final and published drafts of the Fifth Assessment Report, IPCC cut its near-term warming projection substantially, substituting “expert assessment” for models’ near-term predictions. Yet its long-range predictions remain unaltered. The model indicates that IPCC’s reduction of the feedback sum from 1.9 to 1.5 W m^-2 K^-1 mandates a reduction from 3.2 to 2.2 K in its central climate-sensitivity estimate; that, since feedbacks are likely to be net-negative, a better estimate is 1.0 K; that there is no unrealized global warming in the pipeline; that global warming this century will be < 1 K; and that combustion of all recoverable fossil fuels will cause < 2.2 K global warming to equilibrium. Resolving the discrepancies between the methodology adopted by IPCC in its Fourth and Fifth Assessment Reports that are highlighted in the present paper is vital. Once those discrepancies are taken into account, the impact of anthropogenic global warming over the next century, and even as far as equilibrium many millennia hence, may be no more than one-third to one-half of IPCC’s current projections.

About Tom Harley

Amateur ecologist and horticulturalist and CEO of Kimberley Environmental Horticulture Inc. (Tom Harley)

View all posts by Tom Harley →