“witch-hunting obsessions of the climate cult” …

[…] “Without the benefits of low-cost and abundant energy from fossil fuels, much of the world’s poor today and in the future would be condemned to continued poverty, ignorance and exploitation,” the CO2 Coalition letter concludes.  Why pay attention to anyone comfortable with that, especially when their comforts include the abundant energy, technological sophistication, plentiful food, and fossil-fuel guzzling transportation they would deny to so many others?

.

The debate hasn’t even started. Warming believers have avoided anything to do with debate and resort to personal attacks instead. Now the latest attack is on museums? Yes, museums:

In Defense of Fossil Fuels, CO2, Prosperity, and Skeptical Scientists (16 April 2015)
From Breitbart.com: The witch-hunting obsessions of the climate cult took them into the realm of total absurdity with March’s “Open Letter to Museums From Members of the Scientific Community,” which called upon museum administrators to begin refusing donations from the evil fossil-fuel industry…

“TO THE MUSEUMS OF SCIENCE AND NATURAL HISTORY” — AN OPEN RESPONSE (16 April 2015)
CO2 Science is proud to host this open letter response to McCarthy-style demands that museums in the United States accept no charitable donations from companies involved with fossil fuels. Read the response and add your name to the letter…

The witch-hunting obsessions of the climate cult took them into the realm of total absurdity with March’s “Open Letter to Museums From Members of the Scientific Community,” which called upon museum administrators to begin refusing donations from the evil fossil-fuel industry.

“Museums are trusted sources of scientific information, some of our most important resources for educating children and shaping public understanding,” this letter declared.  “We are concerned that the integrity of these institutions is compromised by association with special interests who obfuscate climate science, fight environmental regulation, oppose clean energy legislation, and seek to ease limits on industrial pollution.”

Well, then they wouldn’t want anything to do with the likes of the Climagate authors who admitted “obfuscating climate science,” or promoters of the false “hockey stick” graph that conjured historical warming trends out of tortured data, or former NASA scientist James Hansen, whose global warming predictions were off by a good 400 percent, would they?

But of course, that’s not the kind of “obfuscation” they have in mind.  Hansen is the first signatory on the letter.  Their example of a forbidden museum sponsor is, of course, David Koch of the Koch Brothers, who loom so large as devils in the left’s theology.  The writers of this letter definitely know who their audience is and what sort of whistles they respond to.

  Professor Will Happer weighs in about museums:

“To the Museums of Science and Natural History” – An Open Response

William Happer, Chairman of the George C. Marshall Institute, is leading an effort to persuade American museums to reject calls in an open letter dated March 24, 2015, by a number of scientists that U.S. museums of science and natural history divest themselves of investments and donations from fossil fuel interests.

Not only would such an ill-advised move deny these vital American institutions much-needed funding to keep them open to the American public, it would also lend credence to the erroneous belief that fossil fuels are a great evil rather than the only cheap and efficient form of energy readily available to continue to lift hundreds of millions of our fellow human beings out of a life of poverty, starvation, and disease.

Professor Happer, along with a number of other members of the Marshall Institute board and distinguished scientists, responded to the open letter with one of their own on April 16, 2015, and urge the boards and management of America’s science and natural history museums to “reject the exceptionally bad and misguided advice in the letter. Abandoning fossil fuels, aside from the economic impossibility of that proposition, would not help the environment but would likely harm it, and would be profoundly anti-human and immoral. Without the benefits of low-cost and abundant energy from fossil fuels, much of the world’s poor today and in the future would be condemned to continued poverty, ignorance and exploitation.”

The George C. Marshall Institute proudly supports and applauds the efforts of Professor Happer, members of our board, and the many distinguished scientists for their continued moral courage and intellectual honesty on this vital issue, and we hope that all of our friends and supporters will do the same.

Via email

 

I just wish it would warm a tad more. Two-thirds of Australias warming due to “adjustments” — according to 84 historic stations

About Tom Harley

Amateur ecologist and horticulturalist and CEO of Kimberley Environmental Horticulture Inc. (Tom Harley)
This entry was posted in Climate, comedy, media, Oz politics, science, weather and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to “witch-hunting obsessions of the climate cult” …

  1. Pingback: global warming misery … | pindanpost

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s