Now more apparent than ever, renewable energy has failed the ‘climate change’ activists. This compilation sets out so many items on this topic, it’s hard to single out any individual post, so they are all here: Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #151
A few posts are outstanding though, defying the Green ‘settled debate’ hypothesis:
Germany’s Coal Binge
Green energy mandates have achieved the opposite of their intent.
Editorial, WSJ, Sep 25, 2014
Epic Green fail:
The Crumbling Climate-Change Consensus
Extremists’ rhetoric heats up as their case falls apart.
By John Fund, National Review Online, Sep 21, 2014
Even better, the orthodoxy is questioned:
American Physical Society journal Physics Today: “Physicist Steve Koonin impeaches scientists’ climate consensus”
By Staff Writer, The Hockey Schtick, Sep 24, 2014
Link to article: Physicist Steve Koonin impeaches scientists’ climate consensus
Bu Steven, Corneliussen, Physics Today Wep 2014
Then Dr Curry finds the climate and the debate ‘unsettled’:
Seeking a Common Ground
An unsettled climate
By Judith Curry, Climate Etc. Sep 21, 2014
So much more from SEPP at the top link. h/t WUWT.
From Doug L Hoffman at theresilientearth.com: Unsettled Science
It is also frightening, since it is a clear sign that the Obama administration is about to go on the offensive, spewing nut job, eco-wacko policies for the next two years—call it revenge of the progressive climate nerds.
Guest opinion by Russell Cook | For about two decades we’ve been told the science behind human-caused global warming is settled, and to ignore skeptic scientists because they’ve been paid by industry to manufacture doubt about the issue. The truth, however, has every appearance of being exactly the opposite: A clumsy effort to manufacture doubt […]
[…] The main pillar of support for the notion that humans are causing a dangerous warming of the climate has been the notion of “settled science.” That notion has long been questioned by skeptic scientists. The secondary pillar of support for the alarmist global warming theory has been the notion that industry-corrupted skeptics are unworthy of public consideration. This accusation could easily have been investigated and refuted long ago. That never happened, because of the third pillar: Journalists should not give equal time to skeptic scientists.
We are overdue for the biggest ideology collapse in history, begging for an investigation into why the mainstream media and influential politicians apparently never checked the veracity of claims about “settled science” and “corrupt skeptics.”
An expanded PDF of the report is available here