stopping Margaret River coal … but not James Price Point LNG

And the difference is? There are far more environmental reasons to stop the Woodside proposal at JPP, than M River. Oh, now I see, who in the EPA have holiday homes near Margaret River? Maybe some ministers do too. Another thing, Margaret River’s brand? I prefer the rare forest, dinosaur footprints, and all the rest of the flora and fauna to Margaret River wine, farms and surf.

Two of Margaret River’s biggest … damage to the Margaret River environment and ‘brand’. In it’s official report – released this morning – chairman Paul Vogel said …

Not forgetting “social surrounds”?

‘In effect, this is an EPA ’no’ to the proposal,’ EPA Chairman Paul Vogel said. … significant environmental values, including the social surrounds of the Margaret River .

planning the ‘stopping of Woodside’ from bulldozing country, with traditional owners and environmentalists

Pictured, the ‘social surrounds’ from Walmadany (JPP)

Minister for Environment; Water

Tue 07 February, 2012

State says no to Vasse Coal proposal

Portfolio: Environment

  • State Government rejects proposal to build coal mine near Margaret River
  • Decision follows Environment Minister’s dismissal of appeals and consultation with decision making authorities

The State Government has rejected a proposal by Vasse Coal Management Pty Ltd to develop a coal mine north-east of Margaret River.


The final decision was made following consultation between Environment Minister Bill Marmion and other ministers with an interest in the proposal. (my bold)


“This decision provides the people of Margaret River with certainty that the State Government recognises the uniqueness of the region, both from an environmental and social perspective,” Mr Marmion said.


In May 2011, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) reported that serious risks to important environmental values in the Margaret River region, especially surface and groundwater and the consequential impacts on the social surroundings, rendered the proposal environmentally unacceptable.


In December 2011, the Minister dismissed an appeal by the proponent and others in objection to the EPA’s recommendation that the coal mine be rejected, citing serious risks to environmental values in the Margaret River area.


Mr Marmion was then required to consult with other decision-making authorities, as required under the Environmental Protection Act 1986.


      Fact File

  • Vasse Coal Management Pty Ltd proposed to develop an underground coal mine and related facilities about 15km north-east of Margaret River
  • The mine was proposed to operate for 15 to 20 years, with surface footprint of about 40 hectares and underground tunnel network of about 1,200 hectares
    ‘Social Surrounds’ of Broome?:

    This slideshow requires JavaScript.

    Yes, they did make the right decision for Vasse Coal, now what about doing the same for Price’s Point.

About Tom Harley

Amateur ecologist and horticulturalist and CEO of Kimberley Environmental Horticulture Inc. (Tom Harley)
This entry was posted in Broome/Kimberley, Environment, Oz politics, Resources and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to stopping Margaret River coal … but not James Price Point LNG

  1. Tom Harley says:

    Margaret River is a Conservative held seat, Broome is not.

  2. Pingback: The next West Australian State election … | pindanpost

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s