Keep reading → (Jonova)
While I was away for ten days, the warmist brigade published some documents, the main one turning out to be FAKE!
Surprise, surprise, they have lost the warming science debate so continue with smears and innuendo…and will soon have a ‘knock on the door’ from the lawyers. Fun, fun, fun. They cannot help themselves, so they provide us with a huge opportunity for comedy and entertainment.
The warmist shills are making a big song and dance about The Heartland Institute and their massive funding of around $6million dollars spent on the climate debate, even including a few thousand that the Koch Brothers donated to spend on Health Care!
This is extremely good value in winning the science debate, having been outspent by Obama, Brown (UK), Juliar Gillard as well as Gore and Company by at least 100/1…or is it 1000/1.
Jonova: “Instead the hyped non-denier-gate shows just how incredibly successful the Heartland Institute is. Look at the numbers. The skeptics have managed to turn the propaganda around against a tide of money, and it is really some achievement.
|Greenpeace||$300m||2010 Annual Report|
|WWF||$700m||” ($524m Euro)|
|Pew Charitable Trust||$360m||2010 Annual Report|
|Sierra Club||$56m||2010 Annual Report|
|NSW climate change fund (just one random govt example)||$750m||NSW Gov (A$700m)|
|UK university climate fund (just another random govt example)||$360m||UK Gov (£234 m)|
|US government funding for climate science and technology||$7,000m||“Climate Money” 2009|
|US government funding for “climate related appropriations”||$1,300m||USAID 2010|
|Annual turnover in global carbon markets||$120,000m
||2010 Point Carbon|
|Annual investment in renewable energy||$243,000m
|US government funding for skeptical scientists||$ 0|
These are annual turnovers or annual budgets
So what the expose shows is that the Heartland Institute punches far above its weight with an incredibly efficient budget. “
Comments on all the links are a hoot…