by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.
Given their comments, I doubt any of them could actually state what the major conclusion of our paper was.
For example, Andy Dessler told LiveScience:
This must read post is a good reflection on the use and abuse of ‘peer review’ in Science journalism. The ongoing discussion in comments is well worth the time to read.
Found in comments too is a link to a post up at Climate Etc. on the Spencer and Braswell paper. I have not read it myself yet, but I feel it wont disappoint.