a ‘clusterf’ of Australian science papers … F for fail

Again I am embarrassed by this poor science coming from fellow Australians. There is enough evidence by now that there are educational failings in parts of Australia’s tertiary and related institutions receiving government grants for research. These problem types were not apparent in my career years. They seem to have become common in the last 2 decades and are often in association with the global warming theme.
So can I please ask again for readers not to assume that all Australian science is poor. I can’t produce hard evidence in support, but I can note for example that there is discussion about world class research on medical/immunology themes at present. (Geoff Sherrington)

Canada’s senior climate auditor, fresh from demolishing the science and statistics of a number of Australian papers from Cook (Threats from the University of Queensland) and Lewandowski (The “Ethics Application” for Lewandowsky’s Fury), to Marcott (April Fools’ Day for Marcott et al) and Gergis (Gergis et al “Put on Hold”),

now batters Abram’s et al lack of statistical skills. Steve McIntyre: Abram et al 2014 and the Southern Annular Mode

In today’s post, I will look at a new Naturemag climate reconstruction claiming unprecedentedness (h/t Bishop Hill): “Evolution of the Southern Annular Mode during the past millennium” (Abram et al Nature 2014, pdf). Unfortunately, it is marred by precisely the same sort of data mining and spurious multivariate methodology that has been repeatedly identified in Team paleoclimate studies.

The flawed reconstruction has been breathlessly characterized at the Conversation by Guy Williams, an Australian climate academic, as a demonstration that, rather than indicating lower climate sensitivity, the recent increase in Antarctic sea ice is further evidence that things are worse than we thought. Worse it seems than previously imagined even by Australian climate academics.

the apparent paradox of Antarctic sea ice is telling us that it [climate change] is real and that we are contributing to it. The Antarctic canary is alive, but its feathers are increasingly wind-ruffled.

Continue reading

In other comments, a new word enters the vocabulary, ‘clusterf’ along with other imaginative  and relevant descriptions. Perhaps it’s time to stop calling these institutions Universities.

Heh …

350 x 350 · 72 kB · jpeg·Artwork for the Clusterf***/Cojoba seven-inch EP on Computer Crime …

About Tom Harley

Amateur ecologist and horticulturalist and CEO of Kimberley Environmental Horticulture Inc.
This entry was posted in Climate, comedy, media, Oz politics, science, weather and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to a ‘clusterf’ of Australian science papers … F for fail

  1. Pingback: blinded by poop … climate ‘science’ | pindanpost

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s