Climate trickery is epidemic amongst those present and former Climate bureaucrats and ‘scientists’. Every change in weather to them is climate catastrophe and global warming. Flannery is one of the worst, here he is brought to account, in his own words, and on video here: [...]
[...] Flannery predicted global warming would give us fewer floods, now he says we’re getting more.
But that’s not the end of his trickery. Flannery, who once led the taxpayer-funded Climate Commission, is blaming the 2010 Brisbane floods on global warming, claiming the flood levy to pay for the damage was “the first climate change tax that we paid in this country”.
But the Climate Commission he led actually denied what Flannery now claims:
Commissioner Will Steffen wrote in the May report The Critical Decade: “The floods across eastern Australia in 2010 and early 2011 were the consequence of a very strong La Nina event and not the result of climate change.”
Former Climate Change Chief Commissioner Tim Flannery blames the 2010 Queensland flood on climate change when his own Climate Commission admitted it wasn’t.
Why do people believe a word this alarmist says?
Check it all out … but then watch out for the Big Green ‘dirdy polluders’ as comrade Gillard would say:
Bob Brown leads a bunch of polluters – and, worse, polluters of the seas near the Great Barrier Reef:
A FAULTY switch and instruction manuals written entirely in Japanese have been blamed in court for why a ship owned by conservation group Sea Shepherd dropped up to 500 litres of diesel into the Trinity Inlet.
The environmental organisation, whose Australian arm is chaired by former politician Bob Brown, yesterday pleaded guilty to the marine pollution offence in the Cairns Magistrates Court.
UPDATE, Another wild Flannery claim from yesterday’s lecture:
“Half of the Great Barrier Reef is already destroyed. If we don’t redouble our efforts to reduce carbon pollution, heat and acid will destroy the rest by century’s end.”
By Bob Brown’s boat?
UPDATE, The stupidity and trickery is not just confined to Australia, yet they are peas in the same pod:
Yesterday, WUWT highlighted the NYT cartoon depicting killing “deniers” for having a different opinion, today I want to highlight Naomi Orekses and Suzanne Goldenberg, who seem seem to like the idea of having climate “deniers” arrested under RICO act for thought collusion, all under the approving eye of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard.
Watch the video: Continue reading