The West Australian EPA has decided not to assess Buru Energy’s frakking proposal in the Canning Basin, to the astonishment of Wilderness Australia. There is so much mis-information around on frakking, so here is their publicity blurb, followed at the bottom by links to the science:
Did you hear – the EPA has chosen not to assess Buru Energy’s plans to carry-out 34 fracks this dry season in the Kimberley’s Canning Basin?
The Canning Basin in the Kimberley contains a huge unconventional gas reserve of around 270 trillion cubic feet, which dwarfs the Browse Basin reserves offshore. Fracking is a highly risky activity that involves pumping a mixture of chemicals, water and sand underground at extremely high pressure in order to fractures underground rocks and release trapped gas. Several companies have stakes in a joint venture looking at developing the Canning Basin region. However, Buru Energy is the main player.
See an ABC Kimberley map (right) of the locations marked in red on the right, “Yulleroo”, “Valhalla” and “Asgard” for fracking plans, not being assessed by the EPA – it’s over to us now to appeal that decision.
Key concerns of Buru’s planned fracking program include;
1. Shale gas extraction has the potential for serious environmental impacts, which is demonstrated by science from around the world
2. Buru’s proposal documentation does not adequately address environmental risks
3. The State’s current industry regulatory framework is insufficient to manage environmental risks
4. There is a pressing need for bioregional cumulative assessments to be completed for the proposed unconventional gas developments in the Kimberley
5. It is inappropriate for the proposed works to be approved to proceed while a parliamentary inquiry into unconventional gas is being undertaken
6. There is a high level of community concern which must be addressed
7. The time allowed for public comment on this matter is insufficient
The Good News
A community forum was held on ABC Kimberley earlier this week, which showed that there are inconsistencies with what Buru claims are non-toxic chemicals, compared with what other companies and countries have concluded should be banned or are listed as ‘toxic to aquatic organisms’. Buru’s chief scientist also compared fracking chemicals to a cabbage. Listen in here for the full version of the ABC Kimberley forum.
If you missed it late December, the WA water corporation called for a ban on fracking in areas where it affects drinking water sources, saying contamination risks from the chemicals used are unacceptable.
Also, In response to community concerns, the WA Legislative Council is holding an inquiry into the Implications for WA of fracking (hydraulic fracturing for unconventional gas). They are holding several public hearings in Perth and possibly Broome starting February 7th.
What can you do?
Appeal the EPA’s decision – for just $10 – bargin!
Until Monday, January 28th, you have the right to appeal the decision made by the EPA not to assess fracking at Yulleroo, Valhalla and Asgard. The last two sites are ironically have been named after Norse mythology meaning ‘hall of the chosen dead’ and ‘a world ruled by gods’. Read here about the reasons why the EPA chose not to assess the plan. For the James Price Point campaign around 250 appeals were submitted, this is a great chance to have your voice heard on this issue. Here’s how:
1. Get informed – gather the information from this email and linking documents for valid reasons why the EPA should assess Buru’s fracking proposal.
2. Email your signed appeal to: firstname.lastname@example.org, addressed to the Minister for the Environment.
3. Call the appeal convenor to pay $10 appeal fee for the Environmental Impact Assessment of Buru’s fracking program in the Kimberley – (08) 6467 5190.
Thanks for your support on this important issue,
Jenita Enevoldsen and The Wilderness Society team.
I have posted several times on the science of frakking, so you can make your own mind up. Note, none of their wells are anywhere near close enough to any Kimberley town drinking supplies, but may be near Indigenous Communities.
Read here: Frakking debate…
The hazards of exploration in the Kimberley include wildfires, droughts, floods, cyclones, sandstorms, environmentalists and extreme heat. Buru Energy suffers from all of them …
Update: Just so long as the environmentalists don’t confuse gas frakking with oil wells: Photo shopped
Chris Hope has an article about shale gas in The Conversation today, and regular readers will not be surprised to read that he concludes that any progress in this direction should be accompanied by a carbon tax.
I was going to shrug my shoulders and move on to something else, when I noticed one of the pictures the editors had chosen to accompany the piece:
That, I said to myself, is not a shale gas field. All those wells so close together suggests it long predates the horizontal drilling that has been such an important part of the shale revolution. A bit of googling took me to the Flickr page of the photographer, Amy Youngs, which revealed that she had originally captioned the photo as being of a shale field. To her credit, she had changed it when she received this comment:
This is NOT a picture of hydraulic fracturing. This is an old school oil field with vertically drilled wells, spaced so production can be maximized out of a tight formation. The wells may or may not have been fractured over their lives to stimulate production. If these had been modern fractured wells, the ones everyone is so up in arms about, draw a line from any one of those pads in any direction for a couple of miles out and count the wells that lay on that line or within a quarter mile either side of it. That’s how many wells a single, modern, horizontally drilled and hydraulically fractured well can replace.
Ms Youngs had helpfully given the Google Maps reference for the field, which shows that it is just to the east of the small town of Groesbeck Texas. This suggests that it is the Mexia-Groesbeck oilfield, which dates back to the 1920s. You can take a closer look on Google Streetview.
Update 2, SOURCE: Tolerant Liberals Cancel Screening of Pro-Fracking Film at Festival in Minnesota
The tolerant, open-minded environmentalists of the Left have struck again. This time, the pro-fracking film FrackNation by Ann McElhinney and Phelim McAleer has been yanked from the Minnesota Frozen River Film Festival.
FrackNation had already been accepted by festival organizers for a screening on Sunday but over the weekend it was announced the screening had been cancelled. The cancellation of the screening is a first for the festival, which has been around for nine years.
“The film festival organizers seem to hate alternative points of view, they seem to want to quash diversity. They seem to be scared of the truth,” McAleer said in a statement. “Basically the Frozen River Film Festival organizers have given in to bullying and taken the easy way out and censored a film that might offend environmental elites who think they know best. These people are cultural censors and don’t want the truth about fracking to be shown to audiences.”