Environmentalists and Greens have done themselves and the country immense damage. The recent Green vote in the West Australian State election lost one third of their previous vote, despite Chris Maher’s superb showing in the Kimberley. Now this is a real environmental issue where science is concerned.
Instead, they search for rainbows and unicorns. East Anglia University are trying to spot hoaxes. Oh the irony?
In the mad rush for easy money, fortune and fame, they misled, duped, lied and bullied their way in political and science forums about Global Warming and carbon as a massive polluter. Once, I thought they just did not read the science properly, but once I saw the Climategate e-mails, then I knew it was just one giant Ponzi scam.
“I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temperatures to each series for the last 20 years (i.e. from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.” – Phil Jones, UEA
“Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith regarding the latest (IPCC) report? Keith will do likewise…Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same?…We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.” – Phil Jones, UEA
“We also have a Data Protection Act, which I will hide behind.” – Phil Jones, UEA
“Mike Mann refuses to talk to these people and I can understand why. They are just trying to find if we’ve done anything wrong.” – Phil Jones, UEA
Even the Government Climate Commission snubbed scientific submissions from a well known physicist and other scientists, who tabled a whole sheaf of peer reviewed paper: Labor censors Dr Dennis Jensen — denies peer reviewed science
They denied the peer reviewed papers tabled by a former Climate Change Department scientist. Dr David Evans: Four fatal pieces of evidence »
They denigrated anybody who tried to point out the actual science and not model data. Instead, the world has arguably started cooling. Keep reading →
This should be a Green winner, but I guess they have trouble seeing the wood for the trees:
Figure 5. Variation in topographic expression of sauropod tracks in the Broome Sandstone.
Recent research on Humpback whales is starting to reveal a serious deficiency in Woodside’s Environmental Assessment. They couldn’t see the whales for the dollar signs.
One more thing, CO2 is not pollution, Co2 is plant food. Indur M. Goklany
This illustration from a recent article in Science magazine shows that CO2 is plant food. It is based on both empirical data and model results (not “data”). I know that looking at empirical data might seem like a novel idea to some people, but for some perverse reason, I find it more compelling.